tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20142791.post299641929194094686..comments2024-03-11T07:41:19.149-04:00Comments on The Perfect Substitute: NeuroeconomicsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20142791.post-48096224252594116492008-08-01T16:15:00.000-04:002008-08-01T16:15:00.000-04:00I think that's accurate too, though I'd put that d...I think that's accurate too, though I'd put that down as a strike against experimental economics as a whole, and neuroeconomics would fall into that category. Again, I'm not trying to say that I dislike all of these areas-- they each bring something to the table-- but none are a one package cure for everything across the board.Matt E. Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00290146649328322694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20142791.post-56387755172260355252008-08-01T13:27:00.000-04:002008-08-01T13:27:00.000-04:00Despite my lack of qualifications to comment on ne...Despite my lack of qualifications to comment on neuroscience....here it goes anyway:<BR/><BR/>Whenever I watch/read/listen to neuroscience they commonly seem to compare or draw from quantum physics. Now I believe quantum physics carries the experimental problem that you change the outcome by measuring it. I could see this as being the case in neuroscience, that your perceptions and preferences in a lab with wires taped to your head would differ in the real world. For instance, I might be more responsive to colors in a sterile lab environment than in the everyday world.<BR/><BR/>Just a thought.Justin M Rosshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06990658017459237627noreply@blogger.com