Forbes is a great place for rankings, and since I love rankings, I enjoy popping over to the site on occasion and finding a new list. The Forbes article is here, and the underlying information for the rankings comes from the Environmental Performance Index. (That's a groovy map, by the way.)
Generally, you'd expect richer countries to do better-- they can better afford the economic hit that environmental regulation (like welfare systems) imposes on the economy. To that end, there are some interesting results-- most notably Colombia at #9. Most of Africa does poorly; the danger of a study like this would be to come to the conclusion that Africa is in dire need of further environmental restrictions.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This reminds me of "Good for the Goose, Bad for the Gander" by Hall and Leeson.
http://joshua.c.hall.googlepages.com/Good_for_the_Goose__Bad_for_the_Gander.pdf
Here's a clip of Hall giving a talk on the paper at my alma mater.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5748632211297125622
Post a Comment